Skip to main content

Sherlock Holmes becomes feminist whipping boy

Season four of the Benedict Cumberbatch series, Sherlock, premiered January 1 and if you haven't seen it yet, but are a fan of the show, prepare yourself for disappointment.
After a two and half year hiatus, thinking the show, with Cumberbatch's film career taking off, would never return, I was pleasantly surprised to learn it was in fact coming back for a fourth season.
Then I watched it. The brilliant creation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the cooly logical and highly perceptive Sherlock Holmes and his loyal sidekick John Watson, are, unsurprisingly, considered by the BBC inappropriate for today's audience. In short, they can't allow men to be portrayed as brilliant or brave. In season four, Mary Morstan (played by Martin Freeman's real life girlfriend, Amanda Abbington) is given a much expanded role, which basically involves henpecking Watson (her husband in the show) and belittling Sherlock.
In the premier episode, Sherlock uncovers a murderous cabal of women, who he doesn't turn into the authorities because apparently the men, the victims of said cabal, had it coming. This is of course a continuation of the trend in film and TV: Don't create new dynamic female characters (anyone remember Ripley from Aliens?) Just retread male characters as female, or failing that (as in the case of Sherlock) create a female character presented as superior to the men, cause supposedly that makes it 'better.'
After demonstrating in the first episode of the new season that Mary was (according to Sherlock) better at this (sleuthing) than Watson (but he's allowed to tag along as long as he looks after the baby). In the following episode were supposed to believe that the 45 year-old out of shape Morstan was the leader of a crack para-military assassin team. The words, "I can't have you (Watson) and Sherlock hanging off my gun arm when things go bad," are spoken at one point in the episode and are meant to be taken seriously, as in the 5'5 120 lb Mary is supposedly far better at protecting herself than the 6'2 190 lb Sherlock, or her ex-soldier husband Watson. Yes we've seen women in recent years in various super hero movies, portrayed as ridiculously strong for their height and weight, but not more so than their male counterparts. The new version of Sherlock wants to take us to a world (that the writers apparently see as utterly plausible) where women are not only intellectually superior to men, but all things being equal (no superpowers or enhancements) are physically more capable (biology be damned!)
Doctor Who was given a similar treatment last year by the BBC, so it shouldn't come as a surprise, just the same, it's the 115 year-old literary creation, Sherlock Holmes for Christ sakes. But in 2017, the genius detective is only palatable to audiences if he's a feminist whipping boy... sigh.


Popular posts from this blog

Royal Canadian Navy scandal kept under wraps with help of MSM

A somewhat recent Maclean's magazine article (Canada's Time, except, amazingly, more left wing) was headlined: The (Canadian Vice Admiral) Mark Norman firing mystery.

Then goes on to provide absolutely no analysis whatsoever regarding the mystery, other than putting it down to Canadian defence bureaucracy. There's some hard hitting news from Canada's newsmagazine, about the largest scandal to hit Canadian politics since... well ever, nothing comes close, the Sponsorship Scandal pales in comparison to the the ongoing Navy shipbuilding scandal. With the exception that the media this time won't touch it.

Another article earlier this year from Canada's national broadcaster, the CBC, written by senior defence reporter, Murray Brewster, mentioned the vice admiral's removal, then did the bait and switch to the pervious Conservative government's purchase of sea sparrow missiles. That story was a non-scandal scandal the leftist media has tried to promote, criti…

Trudeau's tearful apology tour

Youtube the multi billion dollar corp that steals from me

A couple of weeks back the ad sense account linked to my Youtube channel showed revenue declining. I don't mean revenue was going down as compared to previous days, accrued revenue in my account was being subtracted. At first just a couple of dollars a day, but now it's $9-$10, so at that pace it won't take long until my entire account is emptied.
During this period my fewer ship has increased substantially, in a 45 day period I gained 3000 subscribers and went from just several hundred views to almost 400,000. Yes I've had a few of my nearly 50 videos demonetized, but actually none of the real blockbuster ones (over 10,000 views) and I've received no community or copyright strikes. So what's going on?
This is exactly what I asked Youtube, repeatedly. At first their answer was analytics and Ad Sense can take a few days to reconcile their numbers, when I pointed out I was talking about a period of weeks, …