Bourbon & Bullets

We're just two days away from the U.S presidential election and incredibly, Hillary Clinton, who is under not one, but two FBI investigations retains a close lead over Donald Trump. The media, that is the Main Stream Media (including Fox) still point fingers at Trump, saying he wants to imprison Hillary, and that somehow is beyond the pale. Actually what Trump said, in front of millions of viewers during the third debate, was that, when elected, he would appoint a special prosecutor to look into Hillary. Considering what we know already about the Clinton Foundation and pay for play, her mishandling of classified material, and the continued bombshells from Wikileaks that sounds entirely reasonable, to my mind anyway, but then I consider myself relatively sane. The MSM rail against FBI Director James Comey, but barely a peep is heard about why he is (supposedly) breaking protocol, in conducting a major investigation close to an election. Ask yourself this, if evidence of ...

Here we are a little over a week out from election day, the end to one of the most contentious U.S presidential elections ever, and the polls tell us that... well we're not entirely sure what the polls tell us? If we believe Nate Silver of 538 fame, it's been over since Sept, the Donald has at best, a 1/5 chance at winning the presidency. And we were to believe the NY Times the election was over in August, no reason for Trump to even bother campaigning. A week ago an ABC poll gave Clinton a 12 point lead nationally over Trump, a good six points above the next highest poll estimating Hillary's lead. Today (Oct 31) that poll is down to Clinton +1, a pretty major swing, and not all of it was due to the new FBI investigation  of Hillary's emails, Trump was showing momentum in all polls even previous to that. All except one. The IDP poll has consistently, for weeks, only shown at most a three point spread between Clinton and Trump, the same day of the ABC poll showing +12...

The biggest question from the predictable liberal media yesterday (Oct 28) was not what had Hillary done now, but why would Comey reopen the investigation now? Before it was confirmed the new emails of interest came from an unrelated investigation into the sexual antics of Anthony 'Can't Keep it in his Pants' Weiner, most observers felt the renewed investigation was the result of an internal revolt at the FBI. Dozens and dozens of agents spent over a year investigating Hillary's private (and illegal) email server, confirmed that she was in violation of U.S. national security laws, the same laws that saw (as just one example) General Petraeus convicted of offences regarding the leaking of classified information to a girlfriend. Obviously it was without the intent to commit treason, but the law is the law... unless you are Hillary Clinton. With that in mind (the General Petraeus part) one can imagine the outrage from aforementioned dozens and dozens of FBI agents, when...