Skip to main content

Toronto Islamophobia march sowing the seeds of Totalitarianism


After the recent, tragic shooting at a mosque in Quebec, the radical left (which is government, media and most of the population of Toronto) are braying for more to be done about 'Islamophobia.' There is no Islamophobia, or discrimination against Muslims in Canada, hate crimes are not on the rise, but they (they being all of the above) want to encourage the Islamophobia narrative in order to accomplish two things:
For government the Islamophobia narrative has given them the excuse to enact anti-blasphemy laws, making it a crime for any citizen to insult Islam, and they clearly intend to enact further, so-called anti-hate speech legislation, which will censor alternative media, and shut down almost any avenue for the free and open exchange of ideas. But not only that, as Professor Jordan Peterson at U of T has famously noted, Canada's Bill C-16, will (in the name of transgender rights) force us to speak government approved words, in effect, they intend to prosecute thought crimes.
Now you may ask how does any of this benefit media? The media monopolies that control print and broadcasting in Canada love the idea of blanket censorship and only government approved media. They will of course be that government approved media, and print especially, will become entirely funded by government, i.e you the taxpayer.
They are partially government funded already, but that won't be enough to stave off bankruptcy, under (effectively) nationalization of the press, executives like the serially incompetent Paul Godfrey will still enjoy a fat salary, without ever having to worry about actually making a profit (not that he seems overly concerned about it now). Approved journalists, as long as they stick to the approved narrative, will have guaranteed jobs for life. So what if it means a end to a free society, job security right?
But what about the general public who march and chant against 'Islamophobia?' Ah, well those are the always dependable useful idiots who will cheer on their own enslavement, with to the bitter end, and will likely look at their chains and proclaim, at least we're safe.












Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Top Ten Trump Myths

THE UNTOLD STORY Top 10 Trump Myths by Gavin McInnes   January 12, 2017 View as Single Page photo credit: Big stock Fake news site Buzzfeed just  published  a fake news story that is so fake, it’s not even fake news. “It’s just fake,” as Kellyanne Conway  put it . The editor of Buzzfeed himself says he  has  “serious reason to doubt the allegations in it,” but he published it anyway because this is “how we see the job of reporters in 2017.” So, the role of reporters is to just barf out whatever anyone throws at them? The dossier implicates the president-elect in everything from being a stooge for the Russian government to demanding women  pee  on him. It’s written like a prank from our side to lampoon how gullible and biased their side is. It’s also a good jumping-off point to discuss 10 other myths about our next president.  (1) TRUMP IS AN ADMITTED SEXUAL PREDATOR Jesus LORD in heaven above am I sick of talking a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The War on Free Speech

THE UNTOLD STORY The War on Free Speech 2017 by Gavin McInnes   January 05, 2017 View as Single Page photo credit: Wikimedia Commons Milos Yiannopoulos “The guy has freedom of speech but to fund him & give him a platform tells me a LOT about  @simonschuster  YUCK AND BOO AND GROSS,”  declared  Sarah Silverman when she discovered Milo Yiannopoulos had just closed a  book deal  for a quarter million dollars. Fellow feminist Judd Apatow was equally disheartened and  added , “we can not let hatemongers get rich off of their cruelty.” The left hates Milo not because he is racist or homophobic (he’s a gay man who fucks blacks) or a woman-hater or a fat-shamer or any other histrionic hyperbole; they hate him because he ridicules their belief system. This is especially evident when you touch their Virgin Mary, the black woman.  As I’ve discussed  before , liberals are obsessed with black women. White men will mo...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sherlock Holmes becomes feminist whipping boy

Season four of the Benedict Cumberbatch series, Sherlock, premiered January 1 and if you haven't seen it yet, but are a fan of the show, prepare yourself for disappointment. After a two and half year hiatus, thinking the show, with Cumberbatch's film career taking off, would never return, I was pleasantly surprised to learn it was in fact coming back for a fourth season. Then I watched it. The brilliant creation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the cooly logical and highly perceptive Sherlock Holmes and his loyal sidekick John Watson, are, unsurprisingly, considered by the BBC inappropriate for today's audience. In short, they can't allow men to be portrayed as brilliant or brave. In season four, Mary Morstan (played by Martin Freeman's real life girlfriend, Amanda Abbington) is given a much expanded role, which basically involves henpecking Watson (her husband in the show) and belittling Sherlock. In the premier episode, Sherlock uncovers a murderous cabal of wom...
Post a Comment
Read more