Skip to main content

President Trump to approve Keystone pipeline

Donald Trump signs orders advancing construction of Keystone, Dakota pipelines



President Donald Trump took steps to advance construction of the Keystone XL and Dakota Access pipelines, marking the start of an era with fewer constraints on the oil industry to the chagrin of environmentalists who have bitterly fought the projects.
The moves, among Trump’s first actions since taking office, are a major departure from the Obama administration, which rejected TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone proposal in 2015 and has kept Dakota Access blocked since September. Environmentalists, concerned about climate change and damage to waters, land and Native-American cultural sites, now face an executive branch that’s less sympathetic to their efforts. For the oil industry, it heralds more freedom to expand infrastructure and ease transportation bottlenecks.
We are going to renegotiate some of the terms
“Subject to a renegotiation of terms by us – we’re going to renegotiate some of the terms,” Trump told reporters today in the Oval Office as he signed the two measures. “And if they’d like, we’ll see if we can get that pipeline built.”
arrested-development-keystone-xl1Foreshadowing Trump’s plans, the president told U.S. auto executives at a White House meeting Tuesday morning: “We’re going to make the process much more simple for the oil companies and everybody else that wants to do business in the United States.”
TransCanada climbed as much as 2.9 per cent to $64.36 at 11:24 a.m. in New York. Energy Transfer Equity LP and Energy Transfer Partners LP, the developers of the Dakota project, climbed as much as 4 per cent and 2.4 per cent, respectively.
TransCanada had no immediate comment on the president’s actions before they were announced, and Energy Transfer didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokeswoman for the Standing Rock tribe that opposes the Dakota project says she would comment “if it happens.”
White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Monday said both Dakota Access and Keystone are examples of projects that would “increase jobs, increase economic growth, and tap into America’s energy supply more.” He said Trump wanted to balance environmental protection with activity that can grow jobs and the economy.
It wasn’t immediately clear what mechanism the documents Trump signed today would take. But his advisers have urged the new president to direct the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to grant an easement that would allow construction of the final portion of Dakota Access, reversing the Obama administration’s conclusion that more environmental scrutiny was needed.
The advisers had also urged the president to pave the way for Keystone XL by rescinding a 49-year-old directive from former President Lyndon B. Johnson that assigned the State Department responsibility for determining whether proposed cross-border energy projects serve the “national interest.”
TransCanada may need to submit another formal application to build the pipeline. The company’s plans for Keystone XL already have been vetted, with years of environmental scrutiny culminating in Obama’s 2015 decision that the pipeline was not in the U.S. interest.

KEYSTONE XL: A TIMELINE

Sept. 19, 2008 U.S. Department of State (DoS) receives KXL application
Jan. 1, 2009 DoS begins first of 20 scoping meetings for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
April 16, 2010 DoS releases first draft EIS; solicits comments on the draft
Jan. 1, 2011 TransCanada agrees to 57 safety measures
Nov. 10, 2011 U.S. President Barack Obama delays project until after 2012 election
Dec. 23, 2011 Payroll tax bill clears Congress, requiring president to approve or deny KXL within 60 days
Jan. 18, 2012 President Obama denies KXL permit, citing inadequate time to complete environmental assessment
Feb. 27, 2012 TransCanada starts Gulf Coast project, southern leg of KXL
March 22, 2012 President Obama says Gulf Coast leg has presidential support
May 4, 2012 TransCanada submits Presidential Permit Application to DoS
May 9, 2012 Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ) holds first of several public meetings to review proposed re-route
Sept. 5, 2012 TransCanada submits new KXL route to Nebraska
Dec. 4, 2012 Final public hearing on Nebraska route
Jan. 23, 2013 Nebraska Governor approves pipeline route
Jan. 22, 2014 KXL southern leg opens with first oil delivery
Feb. 19, 2014 Lower Nebraska court declares state governor’s approval of pipeline route invalid
April 18, 2014 DoS announces on its a hold on its EIS review citing legal dispute in Nebraska
Sept. 5, 2014 Nebraska Supreme Court hears oral argument in KXL pipeline routing case. No deadline for a decision set
Nov. 4, 2014 TransCanada says the costs of Keystone XL have grown from US$5.4 billion to US$8 billion
Jan. 29, 2015 The U.S. Senate approves a bill to build Keystone XL
Feb. 24, 2015 Obama vetoes the bill
Nov. 2, 2015 TransCanada asks the U.S. government to temporarily suspend its application.
Nov. 4, 2015 The U.S. government rejects that request
Nov. 6, 2015 The Obama administration rejects TransCanada’s application to build the Keystone XL pipeline
Jan. 6, 2016 TransCanada files a NAFTA claim and a lawsuit related to Keystone XL
TransCanada has not said it would reapply for permission to build the pipeline, but the day after Trump’s election, the Calgary-based company said it was looking for ways to convince the new administration of the project’s benefits to the U.S. economy. The company has previously said it remains “committed to Keystone XL.”
Environmentalists fiercely battled the project, making it a flashpoint in broader debates about U.S. energy policy and climate change. Landowners in the pipeline’s path warned that a spill of dense crude could contaminate the Ogallala aquifer, a source of drinking water that stretches from Texas to South Dakota. And activists said it would promote further development of oil sands in Alberta, Canada that generally require more energy to extract.
Dakota Access opponents say the pipeline would damage sites culturally significant to Native Americans and pose an environmental hazard where it crosses the Missouri River. Earlier this month, the Department of the Army withheld the final easement necessary for construction beneath the lake.
Energy Transfer has argued it went through the full permitting process and has the necessary approvals. The company has said the line will be in service in the first quarter of this year, a delay from its original expectations that Dakota Access would be operational by the end of 2016.
Swift approval of Dakota Access could reinvigorate the sometimes violent protests at the site of the proposed construction. Environmental activists vowed to continue battling both projects.
“A powerful alliance of indigenous communities, ranchers, farmers, and climate activists stopped the Keystone pipeline the first time, and the same alliance will come together to stop Keystone again if Trump tries to raise it from the dead,” said Travis Nichols, a spokesman with Greenpeace.
Josh Nelson, the deputy political director of the CREDO activist group said the action would show Trump is “in the pocket of big corporations and foreign oil interests.”
“Fierce grassroots activism has stopped these pipelines over and over again,” he said. “CREDO will do everything in its power to stop the Dakota Access and Keystone XL pipelines, and keep dirty fossil fuels in the ground where they belong.”
Pipeline supporters said a final easement for the project would illustrate Trump’s commitment to building out energy infrastructure needed to ferry oil and gas around the U.S. Although Keystone XL would transport oil sands crude from Canada, some space on the line is slated to be filled by supplies from North Dakota’s Bakken shale play.
Dakota Access, likewise, is aimed at giving Bakken producers a new route to energy markets, allowing them to forgo more costly rail shipments that have been a backstop when existing pipes fill up. With a capacity of about 470,000 barrels a day, Dakota Access would ship about half of current Bakken crude production and enable producers to access Midwest and Gulf Coast markets.
Craig Stevens, spokesman for the Midwest Alliance for Infrastructure Now said moves to advance Keystone XL and Dakota Access would be a “positive development” for “our nation’s resource development energy infrastructure as a whole.
Energy Transfer owns the Dakota Access project with Phillips 66 and Sunoco Logistics Partners LP. Marathon Petroleum Corp. and Enbridge Energy Partners LP announced a venture in August that would also take a minority stake in the pipeline.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Royal Canadian Navy scandal kept under wraps with help of MSM

A somewhat recent Maclean's magazine article (Canada's Time, except, amazingly, more left wing) was headlined: The (Canadian Vice Admiral) Mark Norman firing mystery.

Then goes on to provide absolutely no analysis whatsoever regarding the mystery, other than putting it down to Canadian defence bureaucracy. There's some hard hitting news from Canada's newsmagazine, about the largest scandal to hit Canadian politics since... well ever, nothing comes close, the Sponsorship Scandal pales in comparison to the the ongoing Navy shipbuilding scandal. With the exception that the media this time won't touch it.

Another article earlier this year from Canada's national broadcaster, the CBC, written by senior defence reporter, Murray Brewster, mentioned the vice admiral's removal, then did the bait and switch to the pervious Conservative government's purchase of sea sparrow missiles. That story was a non-scandal scandal the leftist media has tried to promote, criti…

DON'T support Rebel Media!

The above headline might seem odd coming from a right-leaning libertarian website, but I assure you it isn't.

Rebel Media is on a fundraising kick this holiday season, hoping to be the Breitbart News of the north. But they can never be Breitbart News for one fundamental reason, they are not a truly independent media outlet like Breitbart.

Media in Canada (and yes I'm speaking from firsthand experience) is about as corrupt as it gets. In print media four major companies control just about everything, and to make matters worse, they don't compete against each other, they illegally collude to secure monopoly markets for themselves.
And on top of that, they are inter-owned. Of the four print media companies, Glacier Media, Black Press, Torstar and Post Media, Post Media owns (approximately) 15 percent of Glacier, and Torstar owns 15 percent of Black Press.

Now you might think the two inter-owned entities would at least compete against each other, but you'd be wrong. Glaci…