Skip to main content

The conservative leadership race according to Lauren Southern

To be fair the above headline should include Faith Goldy, but there's only so much room. At any rate the two Rebel Media reporters posted a piece online attempting to explain the Canadian Conservative Party leadership race to be decided this May. It's a crucial choice for a party that's gotten it so wrong, so many times, and to bungle it this time means another four years of Justin Trudeau, and he's already done a lot of damage.
If you're as yet unfamiliar with the boy king (his father, Pierre, ruled Canada for 16 years) then check out this link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZntyiqpWKw&t=48s
 And that's no exaggeration, a lot of his 'finest' moments didn't even make the cut.


However back to the Tory leadership race, as far as anyone sensible person should be concerned right-leaning Maxine Bernier is the only choice for Canada.
And to her credit, Lauren Southern chose Bernier as her top pick for Conservative leader and (hopefully) Prime Minister. Faith Goldy, who always struck me as having something of an authoritarian bent (and therefore cool to libertarian ideology) thought Bernier's halting English was too much of a handicap. But, again as Southern pointed out, it was never a problem for former Liberal Prime Minister, Jean Chretien.

That said, both the Rebel gals got positively giddy in their approximations of Tory insider, Andrew Scheer's looks (Lauren's a chubby chaser, who knew). Now, there's no denying Scheer's impressive rise in politics. Unlike the little prince, Trudeau, he had to do it through determination and intelligence, becoming the youngest speaker of the house at 35. He's shown himself to be a decent debater, and at times even witty. But you don't become the favourite son of the Tory establishment at 37 (or any age for that matter) by espousing `an end to corporate welfare (as Bernier does) or making an uncompromising stand on any point of ideology. Faith Goldy has been in established media, so she is likely aware that corporate welfare is what keeps her pay cheques coming. Like many on the Canadian Right, she talks partisan politics, and may make a big deal about issues like gun control, but at the end of the day the status quo reins.

Scheer, would be, in short, a disaster. He's a compromiser in the long tradition of Tory leaders, so desperate to capture the mushy middle he abandon's all that he stands for (whatever that might be) and we end up with Liberal Lite, which is only a tad improvement over Liberal Classic (not to be confused with classical liberalism).

The giddy gals at the Rebel correctly identified another of the 14 Tory contenders, Michael Chong as a sheep in sheep's clothing, unfortunately they don't get (or in Goldy's case, don't want to admit) that aside from Bernier, the 13 other candidates are different forms of Liberal Lite. Sure there are a couple of hardcore social conservatives in the mix, but even they are at their core, big government types.

They did however, correctly identify Kevin O'Leary as a raging liberal.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The War on Free Speech

THE UNTOLD STORY The War on Free Speech 2017 by Gavin McInnes   January 05, 2017 View as Single Page photo credit: Wikimedia Commons Milos Yiannopoulos “The guy has freedom of speech but to fund him & give him a platform tells me a LOT about  @simonschuster  YUCK AND BOO AND GROSS,”  declared  Sarah Silverman when she discovered Milo Yiannopoulos had just closed a  book deal  for a quarter million dollars. Fellow feminist Judd Apatow was equally disheartened and  added , “we can not let hatemongers get rich off of their cruelty.” The left hates Milo not because he is racist or homophobic (he’s a gay man who fucks blacks) or a woman-hater or a fat-shamer or any other histrionic hyperbole; they hate him because he ridicules their belief system. This is especially evident when you touch their Virgin Mary, the black woman.  As I’ve discussed  before , liberals are obsessed with black women. White men will mo...

Sherlock Holmes becomes feminist whipping boy

Season four of the Benedict Cumberbatch series, Sherlock, premiered January 1 and if you haven't seen it yet, but are a fan of the show, prepare yourself for disappointment. After a two and half year hiatus, thinking the show, with Cumberbatch's film career taking off, would never return, I was pleasantly surprised to learn it was in fact coming back for a fourth season. Then I watched it. The brilliant creation of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the cooly logical and highly perceptive Sherlock Holmes and his loyal sidekick John Watson, are, unsurprisingly, considered by the BBC inappropriate for today's audience. In short, they can't allow men to be portrayed as brilliant or brave. In season four, Mary Morstan (played by Martin Freeman's real life girlfriend, Amanda Abbington) is given a much expanded role, which basically involves henpecking Watson (her husband in the show) and belittling Sherlock. In the premier episode, Sherlock uncovers a murderous cabal of wom...

Climate Change fraud finally revealed

Lawrence Solomon: Finally it’s safe for the whistleblowers of corrupted climate science to speak out Republish Reprint Lawrence Solomon  |  February 16, 2017 3:26 PM ET More from Lawrence Solomon  |  @LSolomonTweets AP Photo/John McConnico, File   Twitter   Google+   LinkedIn   Email   Typo?   More Whistleblowers at the U.S. government’s official keeper of the global warming stats, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), claim their agency doctored temperature data to hide the fact that global temperatures plateaued almost 20 years ago. Can the whistleblowers be believed in this claim, originally made in 2015? And in the further claim that NOAA then rushed this doctored data into print in time for the UN’s Paris global warming summit of world leaders, to dupe any doubters that the planet was in fact overheated? Of course the whistleblowers can be believed, and not just be...